NOTE: This is long, but highly suggested that you read it with the situation we find ourselves in.

With everything that’s been happening the past few weeks, it makes one wonder whether or not those on the left understand just how close that the Biden administration is moving us to the possibility of WWIII. Look, I’m not trying to be an alarmist here, but with the way the leftists are acting you’d think that not only are they gleefully anticipating a WWIII, but they tend to have a lapse in memory on just what a world war looks like. They talk about it with such nonchalance as Joe Biden is out there pumping billions of our tax money into a war that should never have had anything to do with us in the first place. Biden is hell bent on protecting Ukraine’s borders all the while our Southern border has now seen at least seven million illegals invading our borders since he took office. Most of whom, they have no idea who they are, where they are from, nor where they are in our country right now. While at the same time he pushes us closer and closer to the front door of WWIII. And no one seems to be alarmed at all! How is that possible? And, if that pipeline explosion was done by us, there will be hell to be paid because that means that the US committed an act of war in any way you look at it. We better pray to God that Russia never finds out who was truly responsible for it!

That still brings me back to the fact that most of the media in this country is almost treating it like a joke, or are pushing for us to become fully engaged in a war that will devastate the entire world. But hell, that’s what the WEF (World Economic Forum is rooting for, so they can get rid of the amount of population they claim needs to be gotten rid of to so-call save the earth and so that they can then swoop in as the “knights in shining armor” to bring order to chaos and usher in their dream of a “New World Order”.

But before any of that would to happen, the people of this nation and the world seem to have forgotten exactly what another world war would bring to everyone. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a controlled nuclear strike war or an EMP strike, the devastation would be beyond belief, nuclear or EMP.

Let’s first take a refresher course on a nuclear attack:

Nuclear Attack – What Is It? (According to DHS)

Unlike a “dirty bomb” which disperses radioactive material using conventional
explosives,1 a nuclear attack is the use of a device that produces a nuclear explosion. A nuclear explosion is caused by an uncontrolled chain reaction that splits
atomic nuclei (fission) to produce an intense wave of heat, light, air pressure,
and radiation, followed by the production and release of radioactive particles.
For ground blasts, these radioactive particles are drawn up into a “mushroom
cloud” with dust and debris, producing fallout that can expose people at great
distances to radiation.

What Would Be the Impact of a Nuclear Attack? (According to DHS)

A nuclear attack could cause substantial fatalities, injuries, and infrastructure
damage from the heat and blast of the explosion, and significant radiological
consequences from both the initial nuclear radiation and the radioactive fallout
that settles after the initial event. An electromagnetic pulse from the explosion
could also disrupt telecommunications and power distribution. The energy
released by a nuclear explosion is distributed roughly as 50% shockwave; 35%
heat; 5% initial nuclear radiation; and 10% fallout radiation. This distribution
varies depending on the design of the weapon and the altitude of the explosion.

More Devastating Than Both Bombs in 1945

Understand, even if an attack is one that is a limited attack, those within a mile radius of the initial attack, would all die and would die in agony as the air is sucked from their lungs and they literally are burnt alive from the intense heat of the blast itself. However, how many of you truly believe that the lunatics that run this world would be able to contain themselves and keep the war a limited nuclear attack?

Within that same one mile radius, most buildings, especially residential buildings would be vaporized nearly instantly. Also, ALL wildlife within that small area would also be wiped off the face of the earth. What we need to understand, this one mile radius I’m mentioning here is a small nuke, like a one kiloton size. And most nukes today are far bigger, in fact they are bigger than the ones in Japan were, in 1945,  which were 15 kilotons for the one that hit Hiroshima and 22 kilotons that hit Nagasaki. Approximately 403,000 civilians were killed by these two bombs and over 43,000 soldiers. These were the near immediate deaths, no telling how many 100’s of 1,000’s more died in the days, weeks, months, and years that followed! Today, the average size nuke in the US is 455 kilotons and for Russia the average size nuke is 800 kilotons! Now, if just a one kiloton bomb can travel a one mile radius, this means that the US bomb would would have a radius of 455 miles and the Russian nuke would have an 800 mile radius! That would mean every building and every lifeform in those two radiuses would be decimated by one bomb! That means a completely armed 800 kiloton Russian nuke in a densely populated area could kill over 132 million people! Yet everyone on the left and quite a few of the so-called conservatives just shrug this kind of a threat off and continue to push Putin’s buttons! They would only need one bomb in a strategic location that would the end the United States of America immediately! Let’s put it this way, one 800 kiloton nuke could wipe out the entire Eastern seaboard. Let’s not forget the contaminated water, air, and food supply, anyone who was unlucky enough to survive, wouldn’t last for long because there would be no clean food, water or air within about a 1,000 miles. Yet, they just keep nonchalantly talking about war like it’s still conventional. On top of all of this, nukes also create their own EMP’s which in turn would knock out any power grid that the bomb itself didn’t already knock out. And these warmongers are more worried about the CO2 that cow farts produce!

The Nuclear Blast

Nuclear blasts are explosions that occur upon the detonation of atomic bombs—a nuclear reaction that results in a big burst of energy radiation.

There is also a thermal flash that lasts a few seconds; dangerous because it is much hotter than the sun’s core. This flash then creates a blast wave that expands into the surroundings and destroys objects in its path. The shock wave can last a few seconds to several minutes.

After the Nuclear Blast

After the nuclear explosion and its shock wave have passed, the second stage—referred to as a nuclear fallout—follows. This is when radioactive material is propelled into the upper atmosphere, mainly dust and ash from the explosion.

The nuclear fallout will depend upon the size of the bomb, but the fallout can last anywhere from three to five weeks. However, lingering fallout of radiation can last for decades!

Nuclear Cooling or Winter

The next to follow is the nuclear cooling or winter, this follows as a result of airborne smoke and soot clogging the upper atmosphere. This heavy cloud of nuclear waste will block sunlight, resulting in drastic global cooling much worse than the ice age. And yet, they’re more concerned with cow farts!

The Cold War

The cold war taught many of us that there was certainly clear and certain danger should the US find itself in the midst of a nuclear war. As children we were told over and over again what to do in the case of a nuclear attack. We were warned on TV, on the radio and had monthly drills in school. We may have never been fully prepared but we sure as hell were well aware of the dangers that it posed to the entire world. However, it seems today that the majority of the people in this country has had their focus taken off of the horrors of a war with nukes. This leaves most of us with a general lack of awareness of just how dangerous this could be for the future of all humankind!

Not only would millions upon millions of men, women, children, pets, wildlife, livestock, and plants be wiped off the face of the earth, the nuclear winter could last at least a decade by blocking out the sun totally. The consequences for survivors would be devastating: a decline in global temperature, followed by widespread crop failure, and then mass starvation. You want climate change all you Greta Thunbergs? Well, there you go WWIII would back you up there!

To show just how ignorant people are about nuclear war, when a large group in both the US and the UK were asked what they would want to see happen if Russia attacked Ukraine with a nuke, one out of five in both groups said they would support a nuclear retaliation! We seriously need to educate people and we need to stop the damn politicians from countries with nukes threatening to use nukes in military situations! This is not something to take lightly in any manner. Cause once it happens, there’s no putting the genie back in the damn bottle!

Estimated Overall Death Toll From a “Small” Nuke War

How anyone can call any nuclear war as “small”, I don’t know. But, it’s been estimated that if there was a war with 100 – 15 kiloton warheads, which equals just 0.01 % of the US and Russian weapons combined would result in over 400 million innocent people dying instantly and another eight billion dying of starvation after the fallout and nuclear winter! Yet, watch out for those cow farts!

Anyone who agrees with nuclear retaliation is ignorant beyond belief. Instead of the radicals out there screaming for the demise of natural gas, fossil fuels, and yes cow farts, they should be out in the public educating the people about the unimaginable consequences of a nuclear war. They need to stop wasting our tax money on “green” projects that won’t mean a damn if just one nuke is released! By the way, a nuclear winter would go something like the following:

• Nuclear warheads striking cities would cause firestorms and send huge amounts of soot into the stratosphere.
• That soot would block out much of the Sun for up to a decade.
• Temperatures would drop around the world, leaving many places sub-zero.
• Mass crop failure. International trade in food suspended.
• Mass starvation of hundreds of millions of people in countries remote from the conflict.
• Soil and water close to where nuclear weapons were used would be contaminated for years to come.

Even those people who may be lucky enough not to be within the bomb radius of instant destruction and death, you will still have a lot of suffering. Just one single nuclear explosion could cause over 10,000 severe burn cases requiring specialized medical treatment and with an all out war there would be millions upon millions suffering from severe burns. And just how prepared is the United States should this type of thing happen? Well, right now, there are only enough special burn units to only handle 2,000 such severe burn cases and most of them are only found in urban areas. This means that those suffering from these types of burns in more rural areas would eventually succumb to these burns because of the inability to receive proper care. The same goes for fractures, lacerations, missing limbs, crushed skulls, punctured lungs, and myriad other injuries suffered as a result of nuclear blast. Most of the hospitals also would lay in ruin after an attack and even the simplest cases that most people don’t die from, could end up in death.

In an all-out war, lethal fallout would cover much of the United States. Survivors could avoid fatal radiation exposure only when sheltered with adequate food, water, and medical supplies. Even then, millions would be exposed to radiation high enough to cause lowered disease resistance and greater incidence of subsequent fatal cancer. Lowered disease resistance could lead to death from everyday infections in a population deprived of adequate medical facilities. And the spread of diseases from contaminated water supplies, nonexistent sanitary facilities, lack of medicines, and the millions of dead could reach epidemic proportions.

Other Consequences

Attempts to contain damage to cities, suburbs, and industries would suffer analogously to the treatment of injured people. Firefighting equipment, water supplies, electric power, heavy equipment, fuel supplies, and emergency communications would be gone. Transportation into and out of stricken cities would be blocked by debris. The scarcity of radiation-monitoring equipment and of personnel trained to operate it would make it difficult to know where emergency crews could safely work. Most of all, there would be no healthy neighboring cities to call on for help; all would be crippled in an all-out war.

Could Anyone Survive in the US?

The only studies they have currently are the possible results of a one time hit say by a terrorist or rogue attack. But not much has been studied if it were an all out attack.

Individuals might survive for a while, but what about longer term, and what about society as a whole? Extreme and cooperative efforts would be needed for long-term survival, but would the shocked and weakened survivors be up to those efforts? How would individuals react to watching their loved ones die of radiation sickness or untreated injuries? Would an “everyone for themselves” attitude prevail, preventing the cooperation necessary to rebuild society? How would residents of undamaged rural areas react to the streams of urban refugees flooding their communities? What governmental structures could function in the postwar climate? How could people know what was happening throughout the country? Would international organizations be able to cope?

An all-out war would have destroyed much of the nation’s productive capacity and would have killed many of the experts who could help guide social and physical reconstruction. The war also would have destroyed stocks of food and other materials needed for survival.

On the other hand, the remaining supplies would have to support only the much smaller postwar population. The challenge to the survivors would be to establish production of food and other necessities before the supplies left from before the war were exhausted. Could the war-shocked survivors, their social and governmental structure shattered, meet that challenge? That is a very big nuclear question — so big that it’s best left unanswered, since only an all-out nuclear war could decide it definitively.

The Climate Effect

For a group of people who are hell bent on destroying our most reliable sources of energy, don’t seem to be phased at all at how the climate would be changed due to a nuclear war. A large-scale nuclear war would pump huge quantities of chemicals and dust into the upper atmosphere. Humanity was well into the nuclear age before scientists took a good look at the possible consequences of this. What they found was not reassuring.

The upper atmosphere includes a layer enhanced in ozone gas, an unusual form of oxygen that vigorously absorbs the Sun’s ultraviolet radiation. In the absence of this ozone layer, more ultraviolet radiation would reach Earth’s surface, with a variety of harmful effects. A nuclear war would produce huge quantities of ozone-consuming chemicals, and studies suggest that even a modest nuclear exchange would result in unprecedented increases in ultraviolet exposure. Marine life might be damaged by the increased ultraviolet radiation, and humans could receive blistering sunburns. More UV radiation would also lead to a greater incidence of fatal skin cancers and to general weakening of the human immune system.

Even more alarming is the fact that soot from the fires of burning cities after a nuclear exchange would be injected high into the atmosphere. A 1983 study by Richard Turco, Carl Sagan, and others (the so-called TTAPS paper) shocked the world with the suggestion that even a modest nuclear exchange — as few as 100 warheads — could trigger drastic global cooling as airborne soot blocked incoming sunlight. In its most extreme form, this nuclear winter hypothesis raised the possibility of extinction of the human species. (This is not the first dust-induced extinction pondered by science. Current thinking holds that the dinosaurs went extinct as a result of climate change brought about by atmospheric dust from an asteroid impact; indeed, that hypothesis helped prompt the nuclear winter research.)

Recent studies with modern climate models show that an all-out nuclear war between the United States and Russia, even with today’s reduced arsenals, could put over 150 million tons of smoke and soot into the upper atmosphere. That’s roughly the equivalent of all the garbage the U.S. produces in a year! The result would be a drop in global temperature of some 46.4°F (more than the difference between today’s temperature and the depths of the last ice age), and even after a decade the temperature would have recovered only 39.2°F. In the world’s “breadbasket” agricultural regions, the temperature could remain below freezing for a year or more, and precipitation would drop by 90 percent. The effect on the world’s food supply would be devastating.

How wonderful for the WEF and their elitist supporters, just what they’re looking for.

God help us all.